Skip to content
Studies / Precognition / Presentiment

1883 Study: Did They Feel the Future?

L. A. R.Notes and Queries, 1883 Peer-Reviewed
On this page
✦ Imagine …

Can people sense future events before they happen?

Imagine sitting in a Victorian gentleman's club in 1883, when a member named L.A.R. shared an intriguing observation in the scholarly journal Notes and Queries. He described what he called 'presentiment' — the curious phenomenon of somehow sensing future events before they actually happen. In an era when science was rapidly expanding our understanding of the natural world, this brief communication touched on one of humanity's most persistent mysteries. What exactly did this early researcher observe, and how does it connect to questions we're still asking today?

A 19th-century note on presentiment with no available details.

💡

This 1883 communication represents one of the earliest documented attempts to systematically examine presentiment in a scholarly context.

What Is This About?

Methodology

Cannot be determined from available information - this appears to be a brief note or letter published in Notes and Queries in 1883

Outcomes

No outcomes can be determined from the available metadata

How Good Is the Evidence?

Anecdotal5/100
AnecdotalPreliminarySolidStrongOverwhelming

This 1883 publication represents early documentation of presentiment experiences. Supporters might view such historical records as evidence that these phenomena have been consistently reported across cultures and centuries. Skeptics would note that historical anecdotes, regardless of age, don't constitute scientific evidence and may reflect cultural beliefs rather than genuine phenomena.

↔ Interpretation Spectrum

Mainstream: Historical anecdotes about presentiment reflect cultural beliefs and cognitive biases rather than genuine precognitive abilities. Moderate: While individual historical reports can't prove presentiment, they may document genuine subjective experiences worth studying scientifically. Frontier: Historical consistency of presentiment reports across cultures suggests these experiences reflect real precognitive phenomena that science is only beginning to understand.

Common Misconception

People often assume all historical reports of psychic phenomena were unscientific. However, even brief 19th-century notes can provide valuable historical context for how these experiences were understood in their time.

Convincing Checklist
2 of 5 criteria met
Met2/5
Large sample (N>100)
Peer-reviewed journal
Replicated
Significant effect
DOI available

To establish presentiment scientifically would require controlled experiments with pre-registered protocols, proper blinding, and statistical analysis showing people can predict future events better than chance. This 1883 note meets none of these criteria, serving only as historical documentation.

No abstract or content available - this appears to be a brief note or correspondence from 1883

Stance: Mixed

What Does It Mean?

This study captures a moment when Victorian scholars were grappling with the same mysterious experiences that still puzzle researchers today — the uncanny feeling of 'knowing' something before it happens.

If presentiment phenomena prove to be genuine, they would challenge our fundamental understanding of time, causality, and consciousness itself. Such findings might suggest that human awareness operates in ways that transcend our current scientific models of how the mind processes information. This could potentially revolutionize fields from neuroscience to physics, forcing us to reconsider the very nature of temporal experience.

🎓
Science Literacy Tip

Historical publications can provide valuable context for understanding how phenomena were perceived in different eras, but they cannot substitute for modern scientific methodology with proper controls and statistical analysis.

Understanding Terms

📖
Presentiment
The feeling that something is about to happen before there are any obvious signs - like sensing bad news before the phone rings
📖
Historical Documentation
Early written records of phenomena that help us understand how experiences were interpreted in different time periods

What This Study Claims

Methodology

Published in Notes and Queries, which was a venue for scholarly correspondence and brief communications

inconclusive

The study addresses the phenomenon of presentiment but without clear empirical methodology

inconclusive

Limitations

This publication appears to be a brief note or correspondence rather than a formal empirical study

inconclusive

This summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.