Skip to content
Studies / Precognition / More than just a magic trick? Exploring …

Magic's Secret: Is it all just trickery?

Paul J. Silvia, Sara J. Crasson, Gil Greengross, Gustav KuhnPersonality and Individual Differences, 2025 Peer-ReviewedN = 704
✦ Imagine …

Do some people think magicians use real supernatural powers?

Picture this: You're watching a magician on stage make a coin vanish into thin air. While most of the audience thinks "clever sleight of hand," someone next to you whispers, "I think he actually has psychic powers." Researchers decided to investigate this phenomenon systematically, surveying over 700 adults about whether they believe stage magicians sometimes use real supernatural abilities. The results reveal a fascinating psychological portrait of who sees magic tricks as potentially... well, magical.

Some audience members genuinely believe magic tricks involve real supernatural powers.

Professional magicians have long suspected that some audience members don't just enjoy the illusion—they actually believe the tricks involve real supernatural powers. While most people understand magic as skillful deception, researchers wanted to investigate whether some viewers genuinely attribute magical performances to paranormal abilities. Two studies surveyed over 700 adults to explore who might be most likely to believe in 'real magic.'

💡

People who believe stage magic sometimes involves real supernatural powers tend to be more extraverted, more neurotic, and surprisingly, bigger fans of magic shows themselves.

🔍

Key Findings

  • Supernatural attributions for magic tricks were uncommon overall, but showed dramatic individual variation.
  • People who were more extraverted, more neurotic, and less open to new experiences were more likely to believe tricks involved real supernatural powers.
  • Most tellingly, these beliefs clustered with other paranormal convictions—especially belief in psychic abilities and precognition (seeing the future).
  • Interestingly, people who enjoyed watching magic shows were actually more likely to believe in supernatural explanations.

What Is This About?

Researchers surveyed 704 adults across two separate studies, asking them about their personality traits using the Big Five model (extraversion, neuroticism, openness, etc.). Participants also answered questions about their beliefs in paranormal phenomena like psychic powers, precognition, and conspiracy theories. Most importantly, they were asked whether they thought magic tricks sometimes involve real supernatural powers rather than just skillful illusion. The researchers then used statistical analysis to see which personality traits and beliefs predicted supernatural attributions for magic.

Methodology

Two surveys of adults (412 and 292 participants) measuring personality traits, paranormal beliefs, and whether people think magic tricks sometimes involve real supernatural powers.

Outcomes

Supernatural attributions for magic tricks were uncommon but varied widely, predicted by higher extraversion, higher neuroticism, lower openness, and beliefs in psychic powers and precognition.

How Good Is the Evidence?

#

While exact percentages weren't reported, supernatural attributions were described as 'uncommon'—likely affecting a minority of viewers, similar to general paranormal belief rates of 10-25% found in Western populations.

Preliminary30/100
AnecdotalPreliminarySolidStrongOverwhelming

Supporters argue this research validates magicians' long-held observations and reveals important patterns in how people process ambiguous phenomena. The findings suggest supernatural attributions aren't random but follow predictable psychological patterns. Skeptics might contend that the study simply documents existing paranormal beliefs without addressing whether such attributions have any validity. They may also question whether survey responses reflect genuine beliefs or social desirability bias.

↔ Interpretation Spectrum

Mainstream: This documents interesting individual differences in how people interpret ambiguous performances, with no implications for supernatural phenomena. Moderate: The systematic patterns suggest important insights into human psychology and belief formation that deserve further study. Frontier: These findings hint at possible individual differences in sensitivity to genuinely anomalous phenomena that conventional magic sometimes accidentally taps into.

Common Misconception

Misconception: Believing in supernatural magic means someone is gullible or unintelligent. Reality: The study found these beliefs are systematically related to specific personality traits and broader worldviews, not simply lack of critical thinking.

Convincing Checklist
3 of 5 criteria met
Met3/5
Large sample (N>100)
Peer-reviewed journal
Replicated
Significant effect
DOI available

To settle questions about supernatural attributions for magic, we'd need larger representative samples, experimental studies testing whether exposure to different types of magic affects beliefs, and longitudinal research tracking how these attributions develop over time. This study provides a solid foundation by documenting the phenomenon and identifying personality predictors, but represents just the first step in understanding this psychological process.

Some people attribute a magician's tricks to supernatural methods, and supernatural attributions were predicted by several Big 5 traits and broader paranormal beliefs.

Stance: Supportive

What Does It Mean?

The most intriguing finding? People who love magic shows are actually more likely to believe the magic might be real—suggesting that wonder and skepticism don't always go hand in hand the way we might expect.

Think about watching a mentalist correctly 'guess' someone's thoughts, or a magician making objects appear to move without touching them. While most people think 'clever trick,' some viewers genuinely wonder if the performer has real psychic abilities—this study explored who tends to think that way.

If these patterns hold up in larger studies, they could reshape how we understand the psychology of belief and wonder. The finding that magic enthusiasts are more likely to attribute supernatural causes suggests that engagement with mystery might actually increase rather than decrease magical thinking. This could have implications for education, entertainment, and our understanding of how rational and irrational thinking coexist in the same minds.

Wonder Score
3/5
Fascinating
🎓
Science Literacy Tip

This study demonstrates how correlational research can reveal systematic patterns in human psychology—showing that seemingly random beliefs actually cluster together in predictable ways based on personality traits.

Understanding Terms

📖
Big Five Personality Traits
A widely-used model measuring five core personality dimensions: extraversion (outgoing vs. reserved), neuroticism (emotional instability), openness (creativity and curiosity), conscientiousness (organization), and agreeableness (cooperation).
📖
Paranormal Beliefs
Acceptance of phenomena that mainstream science considers unproven, such as psychic powers, precognition (seeing the future), telepathy, or supernatural forces.
📖
Attribution
The psychological process of explaining why something happened—in this case, whether people attribute magic tricks to skillful deception or genuine supernatural powers.

What This Study Claims

Findings

Supernatural attributions for magic tricks were uncommon but highly variable among audience members

moderate

Supernatural magic attributions were embedded in a family of paranormal and conspiratorial beliefs, particularly beliefs in psychic powers and precognition

moderate

People with higher extraversion, higher neuroticism, and lower openness to experience were more likely to believe magic tricks involve supernatural powers

moderate

People who enjoyed performance magic were more likely to endorse supernatural attributions for magic tricks

moderate

Interpretations

The findings suggest some truth to performing magicians' suspicions about audience supernatural attributions

moderate

This summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.