Mind to Mind: Telepathy Re-Examined
On this page
Can minds communicate directly across space and time?
Imagine sitting in a laboratory in 1956, watching two people in separate rooms try to communicate without words, gestures, or any known physical connection. One person looks at cards with symbols, while the other attempts to 'receive' these images through thought alone. Philosopher Michael Scriven was documenting what he called the most important telepathy experiments ever conducted in England, led by researcher Dr. Soal. But this wasn't just about testing mind-reading—it was about whether our understanding of human consciousness and communication might need a complete rethink.
A philosopher argues that telepathy experiments deserve serious scientific consideration.
In 1956, philosopher Michael Scriven wrote a review arguing that parapsychology deserved the same serious attention that philosophers gave to psychoanalysis and cosmology. He highlighted the work of Dr. Soal, whose telepathy experiments in England were gaining international recognition. Scriven believed that the philosophical implications of psychical research were as important as those emerging from quantum physics.
This 1956 analysis positioned telepathy research as philosophically significant as modern physics, arguing that consciousness studies deserved the same serious academic attention as cosmology or symbolic logic.
Key Findings
- Scriven concluded that Soal's telepathy experiments represented the most important and successful work of this kind ever conducted in England, possibly worldwide.
- He also noted the discovery of experimental precognition through the collaboration between Soal and researcher Whately Carington.
What Is This About?
Rather than conducting experiments, Scriven analyzed the philosophical significance of existing telepathy research. He examined Dr. Soal's experimental work and compared the intellectual rigor required to understand parapsychology with that needed for other scientific fields. He argued that while parapsychology requires statistical knowledge and careful study, it's more accessible than highly technical fields like quantum physics.
This is a philosophical review discussing the significance of telepathy experiments, particularly those conducted by Dr. Soal, rather than describing specific experimental methods.
The author argues that Soal's telepathy experiments represent the most important and successful work of this kind, and that parapsychology deserves serious philosophical consideration.
How Good Is the Evidence?
No specific statistical results are provided in this philosophical review, though Scriven emphasizes that understanding the research requires 'elementary knowledge of statistics' rather than the decade of training needed for quantum physics.
Supporters argue that Soal's experiments demonstrated genuine telepathic abilities under controlled conditions and deserve philosophical attention equal to quantum mechanics. Skeptics contend that later analysis revealed serious flaws in Soal's work, including possible fraud, making it an unreliable foundation for philosophical arguments. The debate reflects broader questions about what standards of evidence should apply to extraordinary claims.
Mainstream: Soal's experiments were later found to contain serious methodological flaws and possible fraud, invalidating their philosophical significance. Moderate: While Soal's specific work may be problematic, the broader question of parapsychology's philosophical relevance remains worth considering. Frontier: Soal's experiments provided genuine evidence for telepathy that mainstream science has unfairly dismissed due to materialist bias.
This isn't about proving telepathy exists, but about whether telepathy research meets the standards for serious philosophical consideration. Scriven argued that dismissing parapsychology while accepting other speculative fields like psychoanalysis is inconsistent.
To settle whether telepathy research deserves philosophical attention would require: well-controlled experiments with proper blinding, independent replication, and transparent data sharing. This philosophical review meets none of these criteria, as it simply argues for taking existing research seriously rather than providing new evidence.
Dr. Soal himself was responsible for the most important and successful set of telepathy experiments ever performed in England if not in the world.
Stance: Supportive
What Does It Mean?
A respected philosopher argued that studying telepathy was as intellectually important as understanding quantum physics—and that the philosophical puzzles of consciousness might be solvable without a physics PhD.
Think about those moments when you sense someone is about to call you, or when you and a friend say the same thing simultaneously. Scriven argued that systematic experiments testing such phenomena deserve the same serious consideration we give to other puzzling aspects of reality.
If telepathic communication were real, it would fundamentally challenge our understanding of how minds work and how information can travel between conscious beings. This could revolutionize neuroscience, physics, and philosophy by suggesting that consciousness operates through mechanisms we haven't yet discovered. It might also mean that human potential for communication and connection extends far beyond what we currently believe possible.
This study illustrates the difference between empirical research (conducting experiments) and philosophical analysis (examining the implications of existing research). Both play important but distinct roles in advancing scientific understanding.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Findings
Experimental precognition was discovered through the collaborative work of Soal and Whately Carington
moderateMethodology
Parapsychological research requires elementary knowledge of statistics and hard reading but not ten years of specialized training
weakInterpretations
Modern parapsychology is as philosophically relevant as symbolic logic and more relevant than cosmology or psychoanalysis
weakDr. Soal conducted the most important and successful telepathy experiments ever performed in England, possibly in the world
moderateThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.