Telepathy Trials: A Scientist's Journey to Doubt
On this page
Can a scientist's skepticism actually block psychic phenomena?
Imagine being so convinced that telepathy and astral projection are real that you dedicate your entire career to proving it — only to become one of parapsychology's most prominent skeptics. That's exactly what happened to Susan Blackmore, a researcher who started as a true believer and spent years designing increasingly clever experiments to capture evidence of psychic phenomena. From testing children in playgroups to investigating haunted houses, from training students in altered states to putting Tarot cards under scientific scrutiny, she found absolutely nothing. Her journey reveals something unexpected about the nature of scientific discovery itself.
A parapsychologist's decades-long search for telepathy found only experimental errors.
Susan Blackmore began her career as a true believer, convinced that astral planes, telepathy, and life after death were real phenomena waiting to be scientifically proven. As a determined young researcher at Cambridge and beyond, she set out to find the evidence that would validate these extraordinary claims. Her journey would take her from testing children's supposed psychic abilities to investigating haunted houses and examining the work of other parapsychologists.
Sometimes the most important scientific discoveries come from failing to find what you're looking for — and having the courage to follow the evidence wherever it leads.
Key Findings
- Despite years of careful experimentation, Blackmore found absolutely no evidence for psychic phenomena in any of her studies.
- Even more tellingly, when she investigated the work of researchers who claimed success, she discovered methodological flaws that explained their positive results.
- Her transformation from believer to skeptic was complete when she realized that proper scientific controls consistently eliminated any apparent psychic effects.
What Is This About?
Blackmore designed and conducted numerous experiments testing for telepathy and other psychic phenomena. She worked with young children in play groups, thinking they might be more naturally psychic. She trained university students in visualization techniques and altered states of consciousness, hoping to enhance any latent abilities. She even tested whether Tarot cards could provide genuine insights. When her own experiments consistently failed, she visited other researchers who claimed to have found positive results, carefully examining their methods and procedures.
Blackmore conducted multiple experiments testing telepathy, tested children in play groups, trained students in altered consciousness states, and investigated claims by visiting other experimenters.
No evidence for psi phenomena was found in any of her experiments, and she discovered methodological errors in other researchers' supposedly successful experiments.
How Good Is the Evidence?
While specific numbers aren't provided in this review, Blackmore's null results contrast sharply with the 32-36% hit rates claimed by some ganzfeld telepathy studies - suggesting that methodological rigor may explain the difference.
Supporters argue that Blackmore was a 'psi-inhibitory experimenter' whose skepticism somehow blocked psychic phenomena from manifesting, and that her negative attitude created an environment hostile to delicate psychic effects. Skeptics counter that this explanation is unfalsifiable and convenient - if psychic abilities can't survive proper scientific scrutiny, they may not be real abilities at all. They point out that Blackmore began as a believer and only became skeptical after repeatedly failing to find evidence despite genuine effort.
Mainstream: Blackmore's null results demonstrate that psychic phenomena don't exist and that apparent positive results in parapsychology stem from methodological flaws and wishful thinking. Moderate: Her findings show that psychic effects, if real, are extremely elusive and may require very specific conditions that current scientific methods cannot adequately control for. Frontier: Blackmore's negative results reflect the 'experimenter effect' where skeptical researchers unconsciously suppress psychic phenomena through their expectations and attitudes.
Many people think that if a scientist doesn't find psychic phenomena, they must be closed-minded or 'blocking' the effects. In reality, Blackmore started as a true believer and used the same rigorous methods that reveal real phenomena in other fields - the absence of results despite genuine effort suggests the phenomena may not exist.
To settle questions about psychic phenomena, we'd need large-scale, pre-registered studies with proper blinding, independent replication by skeptical researchers, and effects that survive rigorous controls. Blackmore's work meets the replication criterion by showing consistent null results across multiple experiments, but as a memoir rather than a formal study, it lacks the systematic documentation needed for definitive conclusions.
None of her cleverly devised experiments revealed a hint of the psi she was seeking.
Stance: Skeptical
What Does It Mean?
The fascinating paradox here is that Blackmore's 'failed' experiments may have contributed more to our understanding of consciousness research than many 'successful' ones. Her journey shows how science sometimes advances not by confirming our hopes, but by forcing us to question our most cherished assumptions.
It's like thinking you have a special ability to predict coin flips, then discovering that when someone else watches carefully and controls the conditions, your 'gift' disappears completely.
If Blackmore's methodological critiques are valid, they could help explain why parapsychological findings often fail to replicate consistently across different laboratories. Her experience might also illuminate broader questions about how prior beliefs influence scientific observation and interpretation. If her account accurately reflects common issues in the field, it could guide future researchers toward more rigorous experimental designs.
Negative results are just as scientifically valuable as positive ones - they help map the boundaries of what's real and prevent researchers from chasing false leads.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Findings
Multiple cleverly designed experiments failed to reveal any evidence of psi phenomena
moderateVisits to other supposedly successful experimenters revealed only methodological errors in their experiments
moderateTraining students in imagery and altered states of consciousness did not enhance psi abilities
moderateTesting of young children in play groups showed no paranormal abilities
moderateInterpretations
The author was accused of being a 'psi-inhibitory experimenter' with the power to abolish paranormal effects
weakThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.