Skip to content
Studies / Reincarnation / Past-Life Memories / Creative histories: Memories of past liv…

Past Lives Boost Creativity? Study Raises Eyebrows

Cynthia A. Meyersburg, Shelley Carson, Melinda B. Mathis, Richard J. McNallyPsychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice, 2014 Peer-Reviewed
✦ Imagine …

Do people who remember past lives think more creatively?

Imagine sitting in a psychology lab, telling researchers about vivid memories of a life you supposedly lived centuries ago. A team at Harvard decided to study people who report such past-life memories, comparing them to others on creativity tests and cognitive measures. What they found was unexpected: those claiming memories of previous lives consistently scored higher on various creativity assessments and showed a particular pattern of brain processing called 'low latent inhibition' — essentially, their minds seemed more open to unusual connections and ideas. The question that emerges is both fascinating and puzzling: what's really going on here?

People reporting past life memories showed significantly higher creativity and more flexible thinking patterns.

In Western culture, claiming to remember past lives is considered highly unusual. Psychologists at Harvard wondered whether such experiences might reflect a particular type of mind - one that thinks outside conventional boundaries. They designed studies to test whether people who report past life memories might have cognitive traits associated with creativity and unconventional thinking.

💡

People who report past-life memories show significantly higher creativity scores and a cognitive style that's more open to unusual mental connections.

🔍

Key Findings

  • People who reported past life memories consistently scored higher on creativity measures and were more likely to have 'low latent inhibition' - meaning their minds were less good at filtering out seemingly irrelevant information, a trait linked to creative thinking.
  • The second study confirmed this pattern: highly creative students were significantly more likely to both believe in past lives and report having such memories themselves.

What Is This About?

The researchers conducted two complementary studies. In the first, they recruited people who claimed to have recovered memories of previous lives and compared them to similar people without such memories on various creativity tests and a measure called 'latent inhibition' - essentially how well someone filters out irrelevant information. In the second study, they surveyed students who had been identified as highly creative versus less creative, asking about their beliefs in past lives and whether they had such memories themselves.

Methodology

Two studies comparing people who report past life memories to matched controls on creativity tests and cognitive measures, plus comparing high-creative vs. low-creative students on past life beliefs.

Outcomes

Past life memory reporters scored higher on creativity measures and showed more overinclusive thinking patterns; highly creative students were more likely to believe in and report past life memories.

How Good Is the Evidence?

#

The study found significant differences in creativity scores between groups, though specific percentages aren't provided in the abstract. Past life beliefs appear relatively uncommon in Western populations, with most surveys finding 20-25% belief rates in reincarnation among Americans.

Anecdotal5/100
AnecdotalPreliminarySolidStrongOverwhelming

Supporters argue this reveals important connections between creativity and anomalous experiences, suggesting both arise from valuable cognitive flexibility. Skeptics contend that the same overinclusive thinking that fuels creativity might also make people more prone to false memories or confabulation. Both sides agree the cognitive mechanisms underlying unusual experiences deserve scientific study, though they disagree on whether the experiences themselves have any validity beyond psychology.

↔ Interpretation Spectrum

Mainstream: This shows how certain cognitive styles can lead to both creativity and false memories or confabulation. Moderate: The findings suggest genuine connections between openness to experience, creativity, and anomalous memories that warrant further study. Frontier: This supports the idea that creative, open minds might be more receptive to genuine memories from past lives or other non-ordinary sources of information.

Common Misconception

This study doesn't claim past life memories are real or that creative people are more gullible. Instead, it suggests both creativity and past life experiences might stem from the same cognitive style - a more open, less filtered way of processing information that can lead to both artistic insights and unusual experiences.

Convincing Checklist
2 of 5 criteria met
Met2/5
Large sample (N>100)
Peer-reviewed journal
Replicated
Significant effect
DOI available

To establish this connection more firmly, we'd need larger studies, replication by independent teams, and longitudinal research tracking whether creativity predicts later anomalous experiences or vice versa. This study provides initial correlational evidence but can't prove causation or rule out alternative explanations like personality factors that might influence both creativity and unusual memory reports.

Those reporting past life memories had significantly higher scores on a variety of creativity measures and were significantly more likely to have low latent inhibition, an indicator of overinclusive cognition associated with creativity.

Stance: Supportive

What Does It Mean?

The most striking finding? People with past-life memories were significantly more likely to have 'low latent inhibition' — the same cognitive trait found in highly creative individuals and some people with schizophrenia, suggesting these experiences might tap into fundamental mechanisms of how our minds process reality.

Think of how creative people often notice connections others miss - like a musician hearing rhythm in everyday sounds, or an artist seeing faces in clouds. This study suggests people who report past life memories might have similar 'boundary-less' thinking that makes unusual connections.

If these findings hold up, they could reshape how we think about the relationship between unusual experiences and cognitive ability. Rather than viewing anomalous beliefs as purely pathological, we might need to consider them as potential markers of certain types of mental flexibility. This could have implications for how we assess creativity, understand consciousness, and even approach therapeutic interventions for people with unusual experiences.

🎓
Science Literacy Tip

This study demonstrates how researchers can investigate unusual experiences scientifically by focusing on measurable cognitive traits rather than trying to verify the experiences themselves.

Understanding Terms

📖
Latent Inhibition
The brain's ability to filter out irrelevant information - people with low latent inhibition notice more details but may be more creative
📖
Overinclusive Thinking
A cognitive style where the mind makes broader, more unusual connections between ideas and experiences
📖
Past Life Memory
Reported memories of experiences from previous lifetimes, considered anomalous in Western culture

What This Study Claims

Findings

People reporting past life memories scored significantly higher on various creativity measures compared to matched comparison subjects

moderate

High-creative students were significantly more likely to endorse past life beliefs and report past life memories compared to low-creative students

moderate

Past life memory reporters were significantly more likely to have low latent inhibition, indicating overinclusive cognitive processing associated with creativity

moderate

Low latent inhibition in high-IQ subjects predicted high scores on divergent thinking and creativity measures, but not creative achievement

moderate

Interpretations

Past life memory experiences may signify an overinclusive cognitive style that is associated with creative ability

moderate

This summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.