Future Shock: Losing Control Boosts Precognition Belief
On this page
Why do people believe in psychics when feeling powerless?
Imagine you're facing a major life decision—a job change, a relationship choice, something that feels completely out of your control. In that moment of uncertainty, do you find yourself more drawn to horoscopes, fortune tellers, or anyone claiming to predict what's coming next? Researchers at the University of Queensland decided to test whether our belief in psychic abilities might actually be our mind's way of coping with feeling powerless. What they discovered reveals something fascinating about the hidden psychology behind our most 'irrational' beliefs.
Feeling powerless makes people more likely to believe in precognition.
Every year, people spend thousands of dollars consulting psychics who claim to predict the future. Australian researchers wondered why these beliefs persist despite lack of scientific evidence. They suspected the answer lies in our psychological need for control over uncertain situations.
When people feel powerless, they're significantly more likely to believe in precognition—and believing in prediction abilities actually makes them feel more in control again.
Key Findings
- People who felt powerless showed significantly stronger belief in precognition compared to those who felt in control.
- When participants read that precognition was scientifically supported, they reported feeling more in control than those who read it was debunked.
- The effect was strongest when people initially felt powerless - belief in precognition seemed to restore their sense of control.
What Is This About?
The researchers ran three separate experiments with 272 college students total. In the first experiment, they made some participants feel powerless by having them write about times they lacked control, then measured their belief in precognition. In the second experiment, they showed participants fake scientific articles either supporting or debunking precognition, then measured how much control participants felt. The third experiment combined both approaches to see if belief in precognition could restore feelings of control when people felt powerless.
Three experiments tested whether people believe more in precognition when they feel powerless, and whether believing in precognition makes people feel more in control.
People with low control showed stronger belief in precognition, and being told precognition is real increased feelings of control compared to being told it's impossible.
How Good Is the Evidence?
272 participants across three experiments - a medium-sized study for psychology research, comparable to many published studies in social psychology journals.
Supporters of this research argue it reveals important psychological functions of seemingly irrational beliefs and helps explain why paranormal beliefs persist despite scientific skepticism. Skeptics might question whether the laboratory manipulations of control truly mirror real-world powerlessness, and whether brief exposure to fake articles meaningfully represents how people actually form beliefs about precognition. Both sides would likely agree the study provides useful insights into human psychology, even if they disagree about the broader implications for understanding paranormal beliefs.
Mainstream: This demonstrates how psychological needs drive irrational beliefs, with no implications for whether precognition actually exists. Moderate: The findings reveal important functions of paranormal beliefs but don't address their validity. Frontier: Understanding why people believe in precognition is valuable regardless of one's position on its reality.
This study doesn't test whether precognition actually exists - it examines why people believe in it. The researchers were studying the psychology of belief, not psychic abilities themselves.
To establish this psychological mechanism more firmly, we'd need larger studies, replication by independent researchers, and real-world validation showing the same pattern outside laboratory settings. This study provides initial evidence for the control-belief relationship through controlled experiments, but the effect sizes and long-term implications remain unclear.
The present research provides new insights into the psychological functions of seemingly irrational beliefs, like belief in psychic abilities.
Stance: Mixed
What Does It Mean?
The most striking finding? Simply reading 'scientific evidence' that precognition might be possible was enough to make people feel more in control of their lives—even though the evidence was fabricated for the experiment.
It's like reaching for a lucky charm before a big exam - when we can't control outcomes, we gravitate toward anything that promises predictability, even if it's not logical.
If these findings hold up in larger studies, they could revolutionize how we approach people's supernatural beliefs—treating them as adaptive responses rather than cognitive failures. This might inform therapeutic approaches for anxiety and depression, where feelings of powerlessness are central. It could also explain why conspiracy theories and alternative belief systems flourish during social upheaval and uncertainty.
This study demonstrates how researchers can test psychological theories about belief formation using controlled experiments that manipulate people's emotional states and measure resulting attitude changes.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Findings
Providing scientific evidence that precognition is possible increased feelings of control relative to providing scientific evidence that precognition was not possible
moderatePeople who were experimentally induced to feel low in control reported greater belief in precognition than people who felt high in control
moderateInterpretations
Despite no evidence that humans are able to psychically predict the future, people persist in holding irrational beliefs about precognition
weakWhen control is low, believing in precognition helps people to feel in control once more, acting as a compensatory mechanism
moderateThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.