Mind Over Matter? Entropy Holds the Key
On this page
Can the future influence the past through psychic means?
Imagine you could influence the outcome of a coin flip that already happened yesterday. Physicist Garret Moddel explored this mind-bending possibility by examining the fundamental laws of physics that might govern 'retrocausation' — the idea that future events could influence past ones. Using thermodynamics and information theory, he investigated whether there are hidden rules that determine when such backwards-in-time influence might theoretically work. His analysis suggests that only certain types of processes — those involving irreversible changes and information uncertainty — could potentially be influenced retroactively.
Theoretical analysis suggests retrocausation requires irreversible processes and entropy increases.
University of Colorado physicist Garret Moddel tackled one of parapsychology's most puzzling claims: that the mind can influence events that have already happened. While experimental evidence for retrocausation exists, it faces the 'bilking paradox' - if you could change the past, couldn't you create logical contradictions? Moddel used thermodynamics and information theory to explore whether retrocausation could work within the laws of physics.
According to this theoretical analysis, retrocausation might only work on irreversible processes where the influencer lacks complete information about the target event.
Key Findings
- The analysis revealed that only irreversible processes - those that increase entropy - can be influenced retrocausally.
- Reversible processes, which can run backward without violating physics, cannot be affected by future mental influence.
- The efficiency of retroactive psychokinesis is mathematically limited by how much uncertainty exists in the person's knowledge of the event they're trying to influence.
What Is This About?
Moddel created a mathematical framework combining thermodynamics with information theory to analyze retrocausation. He examined the 'bilking paradox' - where someone might intervene to eliminate a cause after its effect has already occurred. Using the second law of thermodynamics, he analyzed what types of processes could theoretically be influenced by future events. He defined mathematical limits for psychokinesis efficiency based on information entropy and uncertainty.
Theoretical analysis using thermodynamic principles and information theory to examine the logical constraints on retrocausation and psychokinesis.
Mathematical framework showing that only irreversible processes can be influenced retrocausally, with efficiency limits based on information entropy.
How Good Is the Evidence?
The study provides mathematical formulas rather than experimental numbers, but establishes that psychokinesis efficiency must be less than or equal to the ratio of information uncertainty to total information - meaning the less you know about an event, the more you might theoretically influence it.
Supporters argue this provides a rigorous physical framework that could explain how retrocausation works without violating fundamental laws, potentially validating decades of experimental claims. Skeptics contend that the theoretical framework, while mathematically sophisticated, doesn't address whether retrocausation actually occurs in nature - it only explores what constraints would apply if it did. The work remains purely theoretical without experimental validation.
Mainstream: Theoretical exercises in physics don't validate paranormal claims without experimental evidence. Moderate: Sophisticated theoretical frameworks help identify testable predictions and physical constraints for controversial phenomena. Frontier: This analysis provides the missing theoretical foundation that could explain how retrocausation operates within known physics.
Common misconception: Retrocausation would allow unlimited time travel paradoxes. Reality: Moddel's analysis suggests thermodynamic constraints would prevent logical paradoxes by limiting retrocausation to irreversible, entropy-increasing processes only.
To validate these theoretical predictions, researchers would need controlled experiments testing whether irreversible vs. reversible processes show different susceptibility to retrocausal influence, and whether psychokinesis efficiency correlates with information uncertainty as predicted. This study provides the mathematical framework but no experimental validation of its core predictions.
Here it is shown, perhaps contrary to one's intuition, that reversible processes cannot be influenced through retrocausation, but irreversible processes can.
Stance: Supportive
What Does It Mean?
This study dares to ask whether the arrow of time itself might be more flexible than we think, using the same mathematical tools that govern steam engines and computer hard drives. It's a rare attempt to make the impossible seem merely improbable through rigorous physics.
Think of trying to change a coin flip that already happened - Moddel's theory suggests this might only work if the outcome was truly random (irreversible), not if it was a perfectly predictable mechanical process (reversible). It's like the difference between influencing a dice roll versus trying to change a mathematical equation.
If this theoretical framework proves correct, it could revolutionize our understanding of causality and time itself. The predictions about information entropy and psychokinetic efficiency could be tested experimentally, potentially opening new avenues for consciousness research. Such findings might also have implications for quantum computing and information processing technologies.
Theoretical frameworks in science serve to identify testable predictions and constraints, even for controversial phenomena - but mathematical elegance alone doesn't constitute evidence for the phenomenon's existence.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Interpretations
Psychokinesis efficiency is limited by the information uncertainty in the agent's knowledge of the event to be influenced
weakReversible processes cannot be influenced through retrocausation, but irreversible processes can be influenced retrocausally
moderateThe second law of thermodynamics prohibits psi processes in which signals condense from background fluctuations
moderateThe increase in thermodynamic entropy in irreversible processes is required for causation and retrocausation
moderateThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.