Skip to content
Studies / Remote Viewing / Remote Viewing Can Enhance The Auditing …

Remote Viewing: A New Tool for Auditors?

Stephen L. WoehrleReview of Business Information Systems (RBIS), 2010 Peer-Reviewed
On this page
✦ Imagine …

Could psychic abilities help catch financial fraud?

Imagine you're a forensic accountant staring at thousands of financial records, searching for signs of fraud that could be hidden anywhere in the maze of numbers. What if, instead of relying solely on traditional auditing methods, you could somehow 'sense' where the irregularities are hiding? Stephen Woehrle explored whether remote viewing — the controversial practice of mentally perceiving distant targets — could actually help auditors detect financial anomalies and fraud. His 2010 paper suggests that this seemingly science-fiction approach might have real-world applications in the business world.

A business professor proposes using remote viewing to detect accounting fraud.

In 2010, business professor Stephen Woehrle published an unusual proposal in a mainstream business journal. He suggested that remote viewing - the claimed ability to psychically perceive distant objects or events - could be applied to corporate auditing. This represented a rare crossover between parapsychology research and practical business applications.

💡

This study proposes that remote viewing techniques, previously used in military intelligence, could potentially enhance fraud detection in financial auditing.

🔍

Key Findings

  • Woehrle concluded that remote viewing could potentially enhance auditing processes, particularly in fraud detection.
  • He argued that the technique had been sufficiently validated by previous research to warrant practical application in business contexts.

What Is This About?

Rather than conducting an experiment, Woehrle wrote a theoretical paper exploring how remote viewing might be integrated into auditing practices. He reviewed existing remote viewing research and proposed specific applications for detecting financial irregularities. The paper focused particularly on how remote viewing could be used during fraud investigations, suggesting it might help auditors ask better questions or identify suspicious areas for closer examination.

Methodology

This appears to be a theoretical paper exploring applications rather than an empirical study with data collection.

Outcomes

The author proposes that remote viewing techniques could be applied to auditing processes, particularly for fraud detection.

How Good Is the Evidence?

Anecdotal5/100
AnecdotalPreliminarySolidStrongOverwhelming

Supporters might argue this represents innovative thinking about applying parapsychological research to real-world problems, potentially offering new tools for fraud detection. Skeptics would likely question both the underlying validity of remote viewing and the wisdom of incorporating unproven techniques into professional auditing standards. Most mainstream auditors would probably view this as too speculative for practical implementation.

↔ Interpretation Spectrum

Mainstream: This represents an inappropriate mixing of unscientific claims with professional auditing standards. Moderate: While remote viewing remains unproven, exploring unconventional approaches to fraud detection could yield insights about intuitive decision-making in auditing. Frontier: This demonstrates how validated parapsychological techniques could revolutionize business practices and fraud detection.

Common Misconception

This wasn't a study testing whether remote viewing actually works in auditing - it was a theoretical proposal suggesting how it might be applied, assuming it works based on other research.

Convincing Checklist
2 of 5 criteria met
Met2/5
Large sample (N>100)
Peer-reviewed journal
Replicated
Significant effect
DOI available

To validate this proposal, researchers would need controlled studies testing whether auditors using remote viewing techniques actually detect fraud better than conventional methods. This theoretical paper meets none of these criteria, serving instead as a starting point for potential future research.

Remote viewing can be used to detect anomalies in accounting systems and its most relevant use may be for assessment questioning in a fraud investigation.

Stance: Supportive

What Does It Mean?

The idea that psychic abilities once used by the CIA for espionage could help catch corporate fraudsters represents one of the most unexpected crossovers between consciousness research and business practice ever proposed.

It's like having a 'gut feeling' that something's wrong with the books, but taking that intuition seriously as a formal investigative tool rather than dismissing it as unscientific.

If remote viewing could reliably detect financial anomalies, it might revolutionize how we approach fraud investigation and risk assessment in business. This could potentially save companies millions in undetected fraud and create entirely new methodologies for financial oversight. However, such applications would require rigorous validation and raise profound questions about the nature of human perception and information gathering.

🎓
Science Literacy Tip

Theoretical papers propose applications of research findings but don't test those applications - they're starting points for future studies, not evidence that the proposed applications actually work.

Understanding Terms

📖
Remote Viewing
The claimed ability to psychically perceive information about distant or hidden objects, locations, or events without using normal senses
📖
Auditing
The systematic examination of financial records and business processes to verify accuracy and detect irregularities or fraud

What This Study Claims

Interpretations

Remote viewing has been legitimized as a credible and valuable technique through significant studies and applications

weak

Implications

The most relevant use of remote viewing in auditing may be for assessment questioning in fraud investigations

inconclusive

Remote viewing can be used to detect anomalies in accounting systems

inconclusive

This summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.