Mind Over Matter: Telepathy Research Rebooted?
On this page
How much did parapsychology research grow in the 1980s?
Imagine trying to map an entire scientific field that most universities won't touch, where researchers work in isolation, and where finding reliable information feels like searching for needles in haystacks. In 1991, researchers compiled what became the most comprehensive guide to parapsychology research ever created — a massive reference work seven times larger than its predecessor, documenting everything from university dissertations to secret government programs. This wasn't just a bibliography; it was an attempt to legitimize a field by showing the sheer volume of serious research happening behind closed doors.
Academic interest in parapsychology exploded between 1973-1989, with dissertations increasing seven-fold.
In 1991, researchers published an updated catalog of parapsychology information sources, documenting the field's growth during the 1970s and 1980s. This comprehensive bibliography tracked everything from academic papers to government programs investigating psychic phenomena. The compilation revealed surprising trends about how mainstream institutions were engaging with controversial research into telepathy, clairvoyance, and psychokinesis.
By 1991, parapsychology research had grown so extensively that it required a reference guide seven times larger than the previous edition to document all the studies, dissertations, and even government involvement in the field.
Key Findings
- The field of parapsychology experienced dramatic growth during this period.
- Academic dissertations on psychic phenomena increased nearly seven-fold, and the total number of information sources more than doubled.
- The U.S. government was actively involved in parapsychology research, warranting its own chapter in the compilation.
What Is This About?
The authors systematically cataloged and annotated hundreds of information sources about parapsychology from 1973 to 1989. They tracked books, academic journals, research organizations, university dissertations, and government documents. They also documented changes in the field's scientific status and expanded their glossary of technical terms. The work included a special chapter on U.S. government involvement in psychic research programs.
This is a comprehensive bibliography and reference guide that catalogs and annotates hundreds of information sources about parapsychology research from 1973-1989.
The compilation provides an updated inventory of books, journals, organizations, dissertations, and government involvement in parapsychology, with expanded coverage compared to the previous 1973 edition.
How Good Is the Evidence?
Seven-fold increase in dissertations — from roughly 20-30 studies in 1973 to over 150 by 1989, showing parapsychology was gaining academic legitimacy during the Cold War era when government interest in psychic research peaked.
Supporters point to the seven-fold increase in dissertations as evidence that parapsychology was gaining scientific credibility and producing rigorous research worthy of academic degrees. They see government involvement as validation of the field's potential importance. Skeptics argue that increased academic activity doesn't validate the phenomena themselves, and suggest government interest was driven by Cold War paranoia rather than scientific merit. They contend that quantity of research doesn't equal quality of evidence.
Mainstream: This catalog documents a historical curiosity when Cold War tensions led to misguided investment in pseudoscientific research. Moderate: The growth shows parapsychology was developing more rigorous methodologies and deserved serious scientific evaluation during this period. Frontier: The dramatic expansion reflects growing recognition that consciousness research was uncovering genuine anomalies that conventional science needed to address.
Many people think parapsychology has always been purely fringe science, but this catalog reveals it gained significant academic and government attention during the 1970s-80s, with major universities awarding advanced degrees in the field.
To settle questions about parapsychology's scientific legitimacy, we'd need systematic analysis of the actual research quality in those dissertations, replication rates of key findings, and long-term outcomes of government programs. This catalog provides the roadmap for such analysis by documenting what research existed, but doesn't evaluate the evidence quality itself.
The current scientific status of parapsychology is dealt with in an appendix by leading psi researcher John Palmer, Ph.D.
Stance: Mixed
What Does It Mean?
The most striking revelation was the documentation of extensive U.S. government involvement in parapsychology research — suggesting that official agencies were quietly investigating psychic phenomena while the public remained largely unaware.
Like tracking how many people are studying a new technology, this catalog shows parapsychology went from a fringe interest to a legitimate research topic that universities and even governments took seriously enough to fund.
If this documentation accurately reflects genuine scientific progress, it would suggest that parapsychology had quietly established itself as a substantial research field by 1991, complete with institutional support and government interest. This could indicate that phenomena like telepathy or precognition were being taken seriously enough by various institutions to warrant significant investment in research and documentation.
Reference works like this catalog are crucial for understanding how scientific fields develop over time — tracking not just what was discovered, but how much attention and resources were devoted to different research questions.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Findings
Parapsychology information sources more than doubled in size compared to the previous 1973 compilation
strongThe number of dissertations and theses on parapsychology increased nearly seven-fold between 1973 and 1989
moderateThe U.S. government was involved in parapsychology research during this period
moderateMethodology
The current scientific status of parapsychology is addressed in an appendix by leading psi researcher John Palmer, Ph.D.
strongThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.