Skip to content
Studies / Consciousness-UAP Theories / Concordant Deviance: Commonalties of Uni…

UAPs & Psi: Are We All Telepathic Now?

Michael NahmJournal of anomalistics, 2023 Peer-Reviewed
✦ Imagine …

Could UFOs and psychic phenomena be related mysteries?

Imagine you're a scientist in 2003 trying to get funding to study UFOs — you'd be laughed out of the room. Fast-forward to 2023, and Pentagon officials are testifying before Congress about 'unidentified anomalous phenomena' while universities launch serious research programs. Researcher Michael Nahm noticed something intriguing during this dramatic shift: the strange properties that UAP witnesses describe sound remarkably similar to phenomena that parapsychologists have been studying for decades. Could these two controversial fields actually be investigating different aspects of the same puzzle?

A researcher argues that UFOs and psychic phenomena share surprising similarities.

For decades, both UFO sightings and psychic phenomena were academic taboos - topics that could end careers. But something changed. In recent years, prestigious universities have launched UFO research programs, and mainstream media now covers 'Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena' (UAP) with scientific seriousness. Michael Nahm, a researcher studying anomalous phenomena, noticed this shift and wondered what it might mean for parapsychology research.

💡

UAP and psychic phenomena may share fundamental characteristics, suggesting they could be manifestations of the same underlying processes.

🔍

Key Findings

  • Nahm identified multiple parallels between UAP and psychic phenomena, including their elusive nature, difficulty in controlled study, and similar witness characteristics.
  • He noted that UAP research gained credibility through government acknowledgment, military testimony, and reframing from 'UFOs' to 'UAP.' The analysis suggests both phenomena might benefit from unified theoretical approaches.

What Is This About?

Nahm conducted a theoretical analysis, examining the recent transformation in how UAP research gained scientific respectability. He systematically compared characteristics of UAP reports with phenomena studied in parapsychology, looking for patterns and similarities. Rather than collecting new data, he synthesized existing literature from both fields to identify commonalities. He then analyzed what factors helped UAP research gain mainstream acceptance and considered how parapsychology might apply similar strategies.

Methodology

Theoretical analysis comparing UAP and parapsychological phenomena, examining their similarities and discussing potential theoretical models.

Outcomes

Identification of commonalities between UAP and psi phenomena, with suggestions for how parapsychology research could benefit from increased UAP acceptance.

How Good Is the Evidence?

#

The paper notes that 20 years ago, scientific UAP discussion was 'virtually impossible,' but today top-tier media and universities engage with the topic - representing a complete reversal in academic acceptability within two decades.

Anecdotal5/100
AnecdotalPreliminarySolidStrongOverwhelming
✓ What supports it?

This is a theoretical analysis rather than an empirical study, so traditional quality measures don't apply. The work wasn't pre-registered (meaning no analysis plan was publicly filed beforehand), involved no experimental controls, and reports no statistical effects or raw data. As a scholarly synthesis, its value lies in the author's expertise and the comprehensiveness of the literature review. The paper was published in the Journal of Anomalistics, a specialized venue for anomalous phenomena research. The strength is in conceptual analysis rather than empirical rigor.

✗ What are the concerns?

The paper is purely theoretical without empirical data or rigorous analysis of the claimed similarities between UAP and psi phenomena. The comparisons may be superficial, based on anecdotal reports rather than systematic evidence. The lack of peer review citations and concrete methodological proposals limits its scientific value.

↔ Interpretation Spectrum

Mainstream: Both UAP and psi phenomena likely have conventional explanations and linking them doesn't advance either field scientifically. Moderate: While the phenomena may differ, studying how UAP gained research legitimacy offers valuable lessons for improving parapsychology's scientific standing. Frontier: The similarities suggest both phenomena might represent different aspects of currently unknown physical or consciousness-related processes.

Common Misconception

This isn't claiming UFOs and psychic phenomena are the same thing or that both are definitely real. Instead, it's analyzing how they share similar research challenges and suggesting that strategies which helped legitimize UAP study might also benefit parapsychology research.

Convincing Checklist
2 of 5 criteria met
Met2/5
Large sample (N>100)
Peer-reviewed journal
Replicated
Significant effect
DOI available

To validate these ideas, researchers would need empirical studies testing whether the proposed similarities actually exist, controlled experiments examining any shared mechanisms, and evidence that parapsychology strategies inspired by UAP research actually improve scientific acceptance. This theoretical paper provides a framework for such future research but doesn't test its own hypotheses.

I highlight similarities that UAP share with phenomena traditionally studied in parapsychology and discuss how parapsychology could profit from the recent attitude change concerning UAP.

Stance: Mixed

What Does It Mean?

The most mind-bending aspect is that two fields once considered scientific taboos might actually be studying the same phenomenon from different angles. We could be witnessing the birth of an entirely new scientific discipline.

It's like how mental health went from being whispered about to openly discussed - sometimes scientific taboos can shift dramatically when the right combination of evidence, official acknowledgment, and cultural change occurs.

Wonder Score
3/5
Fascinating
💭 If this is true — what does it mean for us?
If the proposed connections between UAP and psi phenomena are valid, it could suggest that both represent manifestations of currently unknown physical or consciousness-related processes. This might require fundamental revisions to our understanding of the relationship between mind, matter, and observable reality.
🎓
Science Literacy Tip

Theoretical papers like this one serve an important role in science by synthesizing existing knowledge and proposing new frameworks, even though they don't test hypotheses directly - they help guide future empirical research.

Understanding Terms

📖
UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena)
The modern scientific term for what used to be called UFOs - unexplained observations in air, space, or other environments that can't be identified through current scientific understanding
📖
Theoretical Analysis
A research approach that examines ideas, concepts, and existing knowledge to develop new frameworks or understanding, rather than collecting new experimental data

What This Study Claims

Findings

Public and academic acceptance of UAP studies has drastically increased in recent years, making scientific discussion possible where it was virtually impossible 20 years ago

moderate

Interpretations

UAP share numerous similarities with phenomena traditionally studied in parapsychology

weak

Theoretical models could be developed to understand both UAP and parapsychological phenomena

weak

Implications

Parapsychology could benefit from studying the factors that advanced UAP research acceptance

weak

This summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.