Remote Viewing: Glimpse Beyond Reality?
On this page
Can art students psychically sketch distant locations?
Picture this: Two art classes at a university are handed blank paper and asked to draw something they've never seen. Meanwhile, across town, researchers are standing at a randomly chosen location—maybe a playground, a bridge, or a parking lot. The students sketch whatever comes to mind, creating drawings of places they couldn't possibly know about. When independent judges later try to match the drawings to the actual locations, something statistically unusual happens. The matches occur far more often than random chance would predict, with odds of only 3 in 100 that this was mere coincidence.
Art students drew unknown locations with above-chance accuracy.
In 1976, researchers at a university decided to test whether people could psychically perceive distant locations by having art students draw what they 'sensed.' This was one of the first attempts to replicate the famous remote viewing experiments that had been making waves in parapsychology. The researchers chose art students, thinking their visual skills might help them better capture any psychic impressions they received.
Art students drawing unknown remote locations achieved statistically significant matches when judged blindly, suggesting something beyond chance was occurring.
Key Findings
- The judges matched the drawings to the correct locations more often than pure chance would predict.
- With ten options to choose from, random guessing should succeed about 10% of the time, but the actual success rate was significantly higher (p = 0.03).
- However, the researchers themselves noted that while this was encouraging, it wasn't strong enough evidence to be conclusive.
What Is This About?
The researchers randomly selected target locations that the art students knew nothing about. The students then sat quietly and tried to draw whatever impressions came to mind about these unknown places. After collecting all the drawings, independent judges were brought in who had no idea which drawing was supposed to match which location. These judges were shown each drawing alongside ten different location slides and asked to pick which location they thought best matched each drawing.
Art students drew impressions of unknown, randomly selected locations, then independent judges tried to match drawings to correct locations from ten options.
Judges correctly matched drawings to locations more often than chance would predict (p = 0.03).
How Good Is the Evidence?
The p-value of 0.03 means there's only a 3% chance these results happened by pure luck - compared to the standard scientific threshold of 5% for statistical significance. However, this is a relatively weak effect compared to later remote viewing studies that reported stronger statistical results.
Supporters argue this study provides preliminary evidence that consciousness can access information beyond normal sensory channels, especially since independent judges successfully matched drawings to locations. Skeptics counter that the effect was weak, the study lacked proper controls, and the results could be explained by subtle cues in the drawings or judge bias. Both sides agree the study was too preliminary to draw strong conclusions.
Mainstream: The results likely reflect chance variation, subtle cues, or methodological flaws rather than genuine psychic ability. Moderate: The study shows intriguing preliminary results that warrant further investigation with better controls. Frontier: This provides early evidence for remote viewing abilities that could revolutionize our understanding of consciousness.
Many people think remote viewing means seeing locations as clearly as watching TV. In reality, participants typically get vague impressions, feelings, or rough sketches that might contain some accurate elements mixed with incorrect ones.
To settle this question would require large-scale, pre-registered studies with proper double-blinding, multiple independent replications, and transparent data sharing. This study meets the basic requirement of independent judging but lacks the rigorous controls and scale needed for definitive conclusions.
The results (P = 0.03), although not conclusive, were encouraging.
Stance: Mixed
What Does It Mean?
The idea that art students could somehow 'see' distant locations through drawing alone challenges everything we think we know about the limits of human perception. What's particularly striking is that this wasn't trained psychics or special individuals—just regular college students with paintbrushes.
It's like having a friend describe a vacation photo while you try to guess which of ten destinations they visited - except here, the 'friend' never actually saw the location and was trying to sense it psychically through their drawings.
If these results reflect a genuine phenomenon rather than methodological artifacts, they would suggest that human consciousness might access information through channels not yet understood by conventional science. This could fundamentally challenge our understanding of the boundaries of perception and the nature of information transfer. Such findings would demand a serious reconsideration of how consciousness interacts with physical reality.
This study demonstrates the importance of blind evaluation - having judges who don't know the 'correct' answers prevents them from unconsciously biasing their selections toward expected results.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Findings
Independent judges could match student drawings to correct locations better than chance (p = 0.03)
weakMethodology
Two university art classes participated in drawing their impressions of unknown locations
moderateThe study was designed as a preliminary test of the Puthoff and Targ remote viewing paradigm
moderateInterpretations
The results were encouraging but not conclusive
weakThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.