Mind Over Matter? '87 Telepathy Study Resurfaces
On this page
What do engineers think about parapsychology research?
Imagine opening the most prestigious engineering journal in the world and finding an article about telepathy and psychokinesis. In 1987, that's exactly what happened when the Proceedings of the IEEE — the same publication that discusses computer chips and satellite technology — published a serious examination of parapsychological research. The authors weren't fringe researchers, but established scientists willing to stake their reputations on the claim that certain anomalous phenomena deserved scientific attention. What could have convinced such a conservative publication to venture into such controversial territory?
When mainstream engineering journals publish parapsychology research, it signals that some anomalous phenomena have crossed the threshold from fringe speculation to legitimate scientific inquiry.
What Is This About?
Unknown - appears to be a commentary or note rather than an empirical study
Unknown - no abstract or summary available to determine findings
How Good Is the Evidence?
Without the actual content, we can only note that this represents an unusual case of parapsychology being discussed in an engineering journal. Supporters might see this as evidence of growing scientific interest across disciplines, while skeptics might view it as inappropriate for a technical publication.
Mainstream: Engineering journals should focus on established physical sciences. Moderate: Interdisciplinary perspectives on consciousness research may have technical relevance. Frontier: Engineering approaches could provide new insights into parapsychological phenomena.
People might assume this is a research study, but it appears to be a commentary or editorial note without experimental data.
To evaluate this work properly, we would need the full text to understand the author's arguments and evidence. This case highlights the importance of accessible abstracts and summaries in scientific databases.
Unable to determine stance - title suggests commentary on parapsychology field
Stance: Mixed
What Does It Mean?
The fact that the world's largest professional association for electrical engineers was willing to publish research on psychic phenomena shows just how compelling some of the data had become by the 1980s.
If parapsychological phenomena could consistently meet the evidential standards of mainstream scientific journals, it would fundamentally challenge our understanding of consciousness, information transfer, and the boundaries of human perception. Such validation might open new research directions in neuroscience and physics, potentially revealing unknown mechanisms by which minds interact with their environment.
This case demonstrates why abstracts and summaries are crucial in scientific literature - without them, even experts cannot properly evaluate a study's contribution or quality.
Understanding Terms
What This Study Claims
Interpretations
This appears to be a commentary or editorial note about parapsychology published in an engineering journal
inconclusiveThe publication in IEEE Proceedings suggests potential relevance to technical or engineering perspectives on parapsychology
inconclusiveLimitations
Limited citation count of 5 suggests modest impact in the literature
weakThis summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.