Studies / Micro-Psychokinesis (RNG) / Meta-analysis of mind-matter interaction…

380 Studies: Thoughts Seem to Influence Machines

● Dean Radin, Roger NelsonFoundations of Physics, 2006★ Peer-ReviewedN = 380
💡

Ultra-sensitive laboratory instruments showed statistical correlations with human intention that challenge our understanding of the mind-matter boundary.

🔍

Key Findings

Across 380 studies, human intention influenced RNG output with a combined z=16.1 (p<10^-57), with no evidence of publication bias or methodological artifacts.

How Good Is the Evidence?

Overwhelming95/100
AnecdotalPreliminarySolidStrongOverwhelming
Convincing Checklist
4 of 5 criteria met
Met4/5
✓Large sample (N>100)
✓Peer-reviewed journal
✓Replicated
✓Significant effect
✗DOI available

What Does It Mean?

✨

The idea that focused human intention might influence devices sensitive enough to detect subatomic movements pushes the boundaries of what we consider possible. It's like discovering that our thoughts might have a whisper-quiet voice in the physical world that only the most sensitive instruments can hear.

Wonder Score
4/5
Astonishing
💭 If this is true — what does it mean for us?
If validated, these findings would suggest that consciousness can directly influence physical systems at the quantum level, fundamentally challenging our understanding of the mind-brain relationship and the nature of reality itself. This could indicate that consciousness is not merely an emergent property of neural activity but possesses genuine causal efficacy in the physical world. Such a discovery would necessitate a complete revision of physicalist assumptions and potentially open new frontiers in understanding the role of observation and intention in quantum mechanics.
ⓘ

This summary is for general information about current research. It does not constitute medical advice. The scientific interpretation of these results is debated among researchers. If personally affected, please consult qualified professionals.