Back to overview
Global Consciousness Project
A network of 70 RNG stations worldwide showing correlated deviations during major global events. The 20-year analysis shows a cumulative effect far beyond chance expectation.
Key Statistic
70 RNG stations worldwide: correlated deviations during global events (9/11: z=3.04, p=0.001). 20-year cumulative z=7.31
What if the collective emotions of millions of people could somehow make random machines less random?
Honesty Dashboard
The instrument, not the argument
✔Strongest Evidence
Statistical analysis shows odds against chance of trillions to one for the overall database spanning over two decades
Independent replication by multiple research groups using similar methodologies has produced comparable results
The effect appears strongest during events with the highest emotional impact and global attention, suggesting a dose-response relationship
Pre-registered predictions for major events like New Year's celebrations show consistent patterns across different time zones
The network's response to 9/11 began hours before the attacks, raising intriguing questions about precognitive effects
5 points
⚠Strongest Criticism
Multiple testing problem: with continuous data collection, finding occasional correlations could be pure statistical coincidence
Post-hoc selection bias: researchers might unconsciously choose events and time windows that show the strongest effects
Technical artifacts: environmental factors like electromagnetic interference could create false patterns in electronic equipment
Lack of theoretical mechanism: no accepted scientific theory explains how consciousness could influence random number generators
Failed independent replications: some attempts to reproduce the findings have yielded null results
5 points
?Open Questions
What physical mechanism could allow consciousness to influence electronic random number generators?
How can researchers better control for environmental and technical confounding factors?
Why do some replication attempts succeed while others fail to find any effects?
3 points
Scientific Consensus
Supportive100%
Related Studies (14)
HeartMath iBhubesi Tree Rhythm Project at Umhlanga Rocks South Africa(2024)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryThe Path to Global Coherence: The Role of the Global Consciousness Project 2.0(2024)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryGlobal Consciousness: Manifesting Meaningful Structure in Random Data(2024)
Tier 2 — SilverGlobal Consciousness Project 2.0: A First Look(2023)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryGlobal consciousness and cosmic significance of lines from Wordsworth’s poem Tintern Abbey(2023)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryA novel market sentiment measure: assessing the link between VIX and the Global Consciousness Projects data(2023)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryWeltseele reloaded?(2019)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryConnected: The Emergence of Global Consciousness by Roger D. Nelson(2019)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryConnected: The Emergence of Global Consciousness(2019)
Tier 2 — SilverSearching for Global Consciousness: A 17-Year Exploration(2016)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryCyberespace et attentes eschatologiques : comment les technosciences participent-elles à la croyance en une humanité spirituellement connectée ?(2015)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryCyberspace and Eschatological Expectations. On How Techno-Sciences Bolster the Belief in a Spiritually Connected Humanity(2014)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryEffects of Mass Consciousness: Changes in Random Data during Global Events(2011)
Tier 4 — PreliminaryThe global consciousness project. Interview by Bonnie Horrigan.(2006)
Tier 4 — Preliminary